Hud works fine i thought until this.i can move the cards position in the test mode but i dont get live ones! Yeah just checked with NL and PLO, doesnt do either for me with zoom? Or even normal NL tables.

Did you follow the order discussed in the link posted in the prior post? The majority of the problems we find with Zoom is from users not following the specific order needed to display the Zoom HUD. If you followed this order and it still does not work, then contact our and we will be happy to help.

But Poker heaven has it. Also HUD stat boxes are not in correct order (with preferred seating disabled on poker client) GtechG2 (formerly known as Boss) and the International Poker Network (one of the networks which use the Gtech G2 software) just added preferred seating fairly recently but as explained in the Guide I previously provided, PokerTracker does not yet support preferred seating on this network. Maybe in the future. This is on our radar for sure. As for the positioning of the on table HUD stats, this is due to a known problem with GTechG2's lack of critical data needed in the hand histories. In order for PokerTracker to properly place the HUD, our software needs to know how many seats are available at the table.

For example, say you are seated at an 8 handed table but playing heads up vs 1 other player while waiting for a game to start - PokerTracker 4 has no way of knowing if you are seated at a heads up table, a 6 max table, or an 8, 9 or 10 max table which means PokerTracker cannot properly place the HUD stats without your manual interaction. Luckily, we have a solution for that!

Microsoft Office 2019 for Mac provides 5 years of mainstream support. This 5-year term is aligned with the support model for Office 2016 for Mac. Refer to the Microsoft Lifecycle Support policies for more specifics about support for Office 2019.

In the HUD menu we added an option while playing on sites like PokerHeaven which does not include table size information, select Treat As and then choose the proper table size. PS: We do not have a lot of players who submit reports for this network, so if you encounter any problems please let use know. It is ready to be used NOW, the, no need to wait! Although we are still in BETA, the truth is that there are very few bugs; PokerTracker 4 is really rock solid. In fact we just finished a system-wide review of all of the remaining issues to fix, we were surprised at how few outstanding issues there are. PS: We will not comment on an actual commercial release date until the week or two before we go on sale, we like to keep our cards close to our chest;-) - TT Ty Sir How can I see all abbreviations on the HUD?

I mean for some stats works, but not for all. Click Configure, then select Statistics. Type in the name of the stat in the search area, the description for each stat will be shown. In the HUD you can get the full name of the stat by hovering over the stat, a tool tip will be displayed showing the name of the stat, the current session results, and the lifetime (filtered) results.

TT Sry I was wrong, didn't not explained well I guess. I mean on the hud I have few stats without any abbreviation, so I could get confuse because it shows only numbers and I would like to see something that tell me for example: AFq, PFR, CBF etc. Can somebody help me to import my HM2 database to PT4 database? I click-tools-setup assistant-convert HM database. After 2 seconds its finished and at details i have this message: Waiting to convert 1 database. Getting connection to database: HoldemManager2 Extracting 100,766 hands from HoldemManager2. Finished extracting 100,232 cash hands.

Finished extracting 534 tournament hands. Import complete. Conversion complete.

My question is: where i can find the hands imported over the HM2 database?

I look at the encoding speed comparisons vs with Compressor using a local quick cluster so that all/most CPUs are used and wonder, what would have happened if the Mac Pro they used for the test actually had 8 to 16GB of RAM like real video editing machines do so that each core could have enough RAM to do its job effectively? Seems like an unrealistic test designed to hurt Compressor+quick cluster's results. Sure mxo 2 mini max would be a monster timesaver for laptop users who need to encode h264 a lot and want better quality than that USB stick encoding accelerator. And it'll be nice for those who want the accurate monitor for color correction.

Note that not all monitors play nice with all frame rates though. There are costs besides the substantial money too. Note that the mxo 2 mini uses up the laptop's expresscard slot one might want to use for reading SxS cards or more likely connecting an external RAID drive while editing (though you could use FW800 on a MBP). Also if it works just like an MXO, and your external monitor switches between being used as your main/second editing screen and a video playback screen, be prepared for a couple seconds wait with each changeover. Also check out the comment from last year over at the B&H reviews for it about it not automatically creating a keyframe at scene changes (cuts) like compressor does.

Did they fix that yet? By the way if you do go look at the B&H reviews someone complains about matrox support there and I have to disagree, my experiences with Matrox support for an MXO were excellent. Some very fair comments. I just wanted to make you aware of the imrpvements MAtrox has made witht he 2.0 drivers which are now available: Matrox MAX Technology 2.0 for Mac Delivers H.264 Video up to 500% Faster Without Sacrificing Quality Montreal, Canada – July 14, 2010 — Matrox® Video Products Group today announced the immediate availability of Matrox MAX Technology 2.0 for Matrox MXO™2 I/O devices and the Matrox CompressHD card for Mac.

Matrox MAX 2.0 for Mac is a unique technology that implements faster than realtime H.264 encoding for resolutions ranging from iPod to HD. It uses a dedicated hardware processor to accelerate the creation of H.264 files for the web, mobile devices, and Blu-ray.

By using specialized hardware acceleration, jobs are finished with amazing speed and system resources are liberated for other tasks. Quality and flexibility are ensured through direct integration with Apple Compressor and support for other applications on the Mac such as Telestream Episode, Final Cut Pro and QuickTime Pro through the QuickTime codec component. The key feature of this release is the addition of many new control parameters such variable bit rate, constant quality, scene detection, noise filtering and many more, that let users optimize encoding speed and video quality. Web video publishers, in particular, will appreciate the ability of Matrox MAX 2.0 to deliver superb quality video at low bit rates. 'Video professionals delivering H.264 content for the web, iPad, iPhone, iPod, or Blu-ray discs, know how painful it can be to wait for the long encoding times needed to create high-quality video files using software only,' said Wayne Andrews, Matrox product manager. 'They might even be tempted to sacrifice quality for speed. With Matrox MAX 2.0, they no longer need to even consider making that trade off.'

Gtech G2 Announces Full Feature Poker Client For Mac

I'm trying to figure out if the mini will make my life better and am interested in hearing some opinions. Here's my scenerio: Using FCP on an iMac 27' I7. Output is to wide screen SD-DVD.

I have no problems with my set-up and work flow but, I do want to get a second monitor so I can see my canvas larger. I was planing to get the new 27' cinema display when it becomes available. Now after reading about the mini, I'm wondering if the mini and an HDTV is a better way to go.

Which would be a better way to go and why? Perrone, I realize the mini is not a second monitor and doesn't extend my desktop. I just need to see my output larger without constantly resizing windows. I know I can do this with a second monitor but reading about the mini I was thinking it might offer some additional features that might speed things up. It may be a moot point as upon doing further research, I'm not sure the mini can connect to an iMac.

I was thinking you were trying to drag a window to it. But yea, if you're just trying to see a full sized screen of it, I see what you're saying. I guess the iMac doesn't have too many connections or slots eh? Thanks Gary - is there a HDMI/SDI IN/OUT product that does the following: 1. HD HDMI and/or component OUTPUT for FCP monitoring 2. HD-SDI input for prores 422 (HQ) capture 3.

Component output from MBP 17' (expresscard34) of the Finder or PowerPoint so we present PPT presentations. The $449 Matrox MXO2 Mini would handle item 1. The $995 Matrox MXO2 LE would handle items 1, 2.

The $995 AJA IO Express would handle items 1, 2 and 3. (edit, only the AJA Kona card handles 3) For Josh's iMac, your only expansion connection for HD Video IO would be Firewire 800 which limits you to a couple of options: AJA IO MOTU V4HD Hopefully soon we'll soon USB 3.0 on the Mac then you can use a Blackmagic Intensity Shuttle at $188.05! And Jim, this tutorial I made might help you calibrate your HDMI monitor a bit.